Here you can find additional information on the policies, measures and instruments presented in the Sufficiency Policy Database.
You can find an overview of the thematised political strategies within the respective sectors under ‘Structure of the additional information’.
Structure of the additional information
- Policy strategy: Reduce living space
- Measure / action: Sufficiency-oriented moving and living
- Policy Instrument ID 27: Right to exchange flats
- Policy Instrument ID 28: Moving bonus
- Policy Instrument ID 29: Moving advice
- Policy InstrumentID 30: Advice for change of use
- Policy Instrument ID 35: Subsidy for splitting Single-Family-Houses
- Policy Instrument ID 310: Permit and promote alternative housing
- Measure / action: Sufficiency-oriented building modifications
- Policy Instrument ID 74: Design of development plans with diverse and mixed use
- Policy Instrument ID 74: Design of development plans with diverse and mixed use
- Measure / action: Sufficiency-oriented moving and living
- Policy strategy: Using existing buildings for living space
- Measure / action: Use of vacant buildings
- Policy Instrument ID 31: Monitoring vacancies
- Policy Instrument ID 299: Support the use of vacant buildings and offices for housing
- Policy Instrument ID 302: Support the use of vacant buildings and offices for housing
- Policy Instrument ID 322: Tax vacant dwellings
- Policy Instrument ID 338: Tax vacant dwellings
- Measure / action: Protect existing buildings and living space
- Policy Instrument ID 33: Protection of living space by control numbers
- Policy Instrument ID 68: Prohibition of misuse of living space
- Measure / action: Vertical densification
- Policy Instrument ID 70: Reduce approval requirements for house-top story addition
- Policy Instrument ID 70: Reduce approval requirements for house-top story addition
- Measure / action: Conversion of buildings into living space
- Policy Instrument ID 75: Loans for conversion to living space
- Policy Instrument ID 75: Loans for conversion to living space
- Measure / action: Use of vacant buildings
- Policy strategy: Sustainable urban- and settlement development without new sealing
- Measure / action: Support inner-city green areas
- Policy Instrument ID 80: Determine green area factor for city planning
- Policy Instrument ID 80: Determine green area factor for city planning
- Measure / action: Limit land consumption to net-zero
- Policy Instrument ID 62: Upper limit for land consumption + allocation scheme
- Policy Instrument ID 63: Cap-and trade system for construction area
- Policy Instrument ID 343: Impede new construction
- Measure / action: Reduce urban sprawl
- Measure / action: Support inner-city green areas
- Policy strategy: Reduce energy consumption
- Measure / action: Raising awareness for the reduction of energy consumption
- Policy Instrument ID 26: Information about energy savings by reduced heating temperature
- Policy Instrument ID 137: Consumer consulting
- Policy Instrument ID 139: Information campaigns
- Policy Instrument ID 140: Peer energy comparision
- Policy Instrument ID 141: Real-time information about the energy consumption
- Measure / action: Reduce car parking spaces
- Policy Instrument ID 77: Abolish privileges for underground parking spaces
- Policy Instrument ID 77: Abolish privileges for underground parking spaces
- Measure / action: Reduce hot water provision
- Policy Instrument ID 404: Limitation/switch-off of hot water in public buildings
- Measure / action: Raising awareness for the reduction of energy consumption
- Policy strategy: Reduce waste
- Measure / action: Mitigate waste production
- Measure / action: Mitigate waste production
- Policy strategy: Increase durability of products
- Measure / action: Larger market share of repaired and durable products
- Policy Instrument ID 152: Mandatory disclosure on the minimum lifetime and expected lifespan of a product
- Policy Instrument ID 153: No choice between repair vs. new product
- Policy Instrument ID 155: Regulate repairability of products
- Policy Instrument ID 160: VAT-reduction for repaired products; repair services
- Policy Instrument ID 389: Prohibition of planned obsolescence
- Measure / action: Enable customers to repair products
- Policy Instrument ID 156: Access to spare parts
- Policy Instrument ID 158: Access to affordable spare parts
- Policy instrument ID 161: Repair bonus
- Measure / action: Larger market share of repaired and durable products
- Policy strategy: Exnovation
- Measure / action: Phase-out of environmentally harming materials
- Policy instrument ID 164: Ban microplastics
- Policy instrument ID 164: Ban microplastics
- Measure / action: Reduce barriers (policies, legislation, cultural) for sufficiency
- Policy Instrument ID 143: Eliminate barriers for wood-use
- Policy Instrument ID 143: Eliminate barriers for wood-use
- Measure / action: Phase-out of environmentally harming materials
- Policy strategy: Strengthen regional economies
- Policy strategy: Extensify_land-use_to_increase_natural_carbon_sinks
- Measure / action: Increase biomass in forests
- Policy Instrument ID 386: Reduction in timber extraction, especially for hardwoods
- Policy Instrument ID 386: Reduction in timber extraction, especially for hardwoods
- Measure / action: Increase biomass in forests
- Policy strategy: Increase regional food production and processing
- Policy strategy: Reduction of live stock
- Measure / action: Diet shift
- Policy instrument ID 1: Animal protein tax
- Policy Instrument ID 2: Initiativen in Schulen
- Policy instrument ID 5: Action plan on mass catering
- Policy Instrument ID 6: Diet shift: voluntary self-commitment of employers/cantines
- Policy Instrument ID 8: Masterplan with nutritional recommendations compatible with the Paris Agreement / PHD
- Policy Instrument ID 9: Taxation of animal products
- Policy Instrument ID 314: Climate-friendly catering
- Measure / action: Reduction of animal farming and international trade of animal products
- Policy Instrument ID 13: EU wide emission trading for animal products and mineral fertilizer
- Policy Instrument ID 13: EU wide emission trading for animal products and mineral fertilizer
- Measure / action: Diet shift
- Policy strategy: Reduction of food waste / overconsumption and -production
- Measure / action: Reduction of food waste
- Policy instrument ID 21: Development of a network of distribution platforms and food platforms
- Policy instrument ID 308: Sale of “over-the-date” food or passing to social markets
- Measure / action: Reduction of the consumption of climate harmful food and drinks
- Policy instrument ID 24: marketing ban of climate harmful foods and drinks
- Policy instrument ID 24: marketing ban of climate harmful foods and drinks
- Measure / action: Reduction of food waste
- Policy strategy: Steer and reduce agricultural area
- Measure / action: No agricultural use of wetlands
- Policy instrument ID 178: Regulate use of wetlands (no agricultural use)
- Policy instrument ID 362: Rewetting of peat soils
- Measure / action: No agricultural use of wetlands
- Policy strategy: Limits to consumption
- Measure / action: Disincentivise high energy consumption
- Policy Instrument ID 91: Reduced energy subsidies for companies
- Policy Instrument ID 107: Progressive electricity tariffs
- Policy Instrument ID 307: Mandatory energy audits
- Measure / action: Reduction and regulation of advertising
- Measure / action: Limitation of illumination
- Politisches Instrument ID 173: Lighting ban (night)
- Politisches Instrument ID 173: Lighting ban (night)
- Measure / action: Disincentivise high energy consumption
- Policy strategy: Social Innovations/Research and Development for Sufficiency
- Measure / action: Funding for sufficiency research and consultancy
- Policy Instrument ID 291: Create government institutions / intermediaries working on energy sufficiency, e.g. research, consultancy, communication
- Policy Instrument ID 291: Create government institutions / intermediaries working on energy sufficiency, e.g. research, consultancy, communication
- Measure / action: Funding for sufficiency research and consultancy
- Policy strategy: Internalisation of external costs and limits to externalisation
- Measure / action: Pricing of GHG emissions
- Policy Instrument ID 89: Inflation indexing (in fuel taxation reform)
- Policy Instrument ID 92: Carbon pricing
- Policy Instrument ID 94: Carbon tax for heat and transport
- Policy Instrument ID 95: Tax incentives for low-carbon products
- Measure / action: Pricing of GHG emissions
- Policy strategy: Re-distribute and reduce paid work time
- Measure / action: Regulate reduction of working hours
- Policy Instrument ID 135: Four-day work week
- Policy Instrument ID 135: Four-day work week
- Measure / action: Regulate reduction of working hours
- Policy strategy: Limits to Production
- Measure / action: Ban certain products
- Policy Instrument ID 305: Ban on all highly damaging goods
- Policy Instrument ID 305: Ban on all highly damaging goods
- Measure / action: Ban certain products
- Policy strategy: Develop a growth independent society
- Measure / action: Accept a steady state of the economy, rollback of growth policy
- Policy strategy ID 88: Introduce beyond-GDP measurement
- Measure / action: Accept a steady state of the economy, rollback of growth policy
- Policy strategy: Reduce trips: work
- Measure / action: Promotion of teleworking
- Policy Instrument ID 188: Teleworking agreements with companies
- Policy Instrument ID 188: Teleworking agreements with companies
- Measure / action: Reduce commuting trips
- Policy Instrument ID 192: Right to Work from Home
- Policy Instrument ID 232: Mandatory company mobility management
- Measure / action: Promotion of teleworking
- Policy strategy: Reduce trips: local supply
- Measure / action: Transit-oriented space planning
- Policy Instrument ID 196: Space planning urban/rural
- Policy Instrument ID 196: Space planning urban/rural
- Measure / action: Transit-oriented space planning
- Policy strategy: Reduce motorized individual transport
- Measure / action: Reduce parking in public place
- Policy Instrument ID 202: Re-assignation of parking spaces
- Policy Instrument ID 203: General restriction of allowed parking
- Policy Instrument ID 204: Red. obligatory parking space/appartment
- Policy Instrument ID 206: Residents parking fee increase
- Policy Instrument ID 237: Digital parking controls
- Measure / action: Reduction of parking traffic
- Policy Instrument ID 238: Support of parking management system
- Policy Instrument ID 238: Support of parking management system
- Measure / action: Infrastructure investment shift to public transport
- Policy Instrument ID 211: Legal basis for infrastructure needs planning (national)
- Policy Instrument ID 211: Legal basis for infrastructure needs planning (national)
- Measure / action: Disincentivise car aquisition/ownership
- Policy Instrument ID 241: Car admission tax
- Policy Instrument ID 347: Premium for car scrapping
- Measure / action: Higher cost of car use
- Policy Instrument ID 235: City road charge
- Policy Instrument ID 235: City road charge
- Measure / action: Car-free city centers
- Policy Instrument ID 231: Car access restriction
- Policy Instrument ID 321: Car-free days
- Policy Instrument ID 330: Car access restriction to city quarters (Superblocks)
- Measure / action: Relieve disadvantage of public transport users
- Policy Instrument ID 239: Car tax reform
- Policy Instrument ID 239: Car tax reform
- Measure / action: Legal framework adaption
- Policy Instrument ID 304: Road speed limits
- Policy Instrument ID 304: Road speed limits
- Measure / action: Reduce parking in public place
- Policy strategy: Reduce air transport
- Measure / action: Limit supply
- Policy Instrument ID 228: Ban on air travel within the EU of less than 600 km
- Policy Instrument ID 229: Domestic air travel ban
- Policy Instrument ID 276: Aviation carbon tax
- Policy Instrument ID 364: Frequent flyer tax
- Policy Instrument ID 377: Air travel ban
- Measure / action: Limit supply
- Policy strategy: Improve public transport and multi-modality
- Measure / action: Attractive public transport prices
- Policy Instrument ID 258: 365€ ticket or cheaper
- Policy Instrument ID 259: Free local public transport tickets, alternative financing, service expansion
- Measure / action: Public transport funding
- Policy Instrument ID 250: Employer pay local public transport fee
- Policy Instrument ID 286: Higher national & departmental funds
- Measure / action: Higher network density and frequency
- Policy Instrument ID 379: On-demand transport
- Policy Instrument ID 379: On-demand transport
- Measure / action: Attractive public transport prices
- Policy strategy: Improve freight rail
- Measure / action: Improve infrastructure
- Policy Instrument ID 278: Financial support of road-rail connectivity infrastructure
- Policy Instrument ID 278: Financial support of road-rail connectivity infrastructure
- Measure / action: Improve infrastructure
- Policy strategy: Reduce freight
- Measure / action: Reduce road freight
- Policy Instrument ID 280: Extend and increase freight toll
- Policy Instrument ID 280: Extend and increase freight toll
- Measure / action: Reduce road freight
- Policy strategy: Promotion of active modes
- Measure / action: Promote cycling
- Policy Instrument ID 215: Expansion of cycling infrastructure and better framework conditions
- Policy Instrument ID 215: Expansion of cycling infrastructure and better framework conditions
- Measure / action: Less road space, more space for bicycles and pedestrians
- Policy Instrument ID 267: Conversion of road space to bicycle; pedestrian infrastructure
- Measure / action: Promote cycling
Buildings
Policy strategy: Reduce living space
Quantification: An overview of the reduction potential of activity levels in ambitious European net-zero scenarios can be found here: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad966e
Measure / action: Sufficiency-oriented moving and living
Implementation example: ‘In Plittersdorf, another new construction project with 31 privately financed rental flats was built in Steinstrasse. A total of 30 barrier-free two- and three-bedroom flats were provided there as part of the ‘Apartment exchange in Bonn’ pilot project.
The aim of the pilot project was for people living in flats that were too large for their needs to free up this living space for families who need more space and reduce their floor area.
The building was completed on 1 June 2023 and handed over to the new residents.’
Source: https://www.vebowag.de/2021/12/17/steinstrasse-2/
Implementation examples: France: Structure to bring people of different ages in contact so as to organise intergenerational living. Respondes to the social problem of isolation of elderly people and the missing living opportunities for younger people. Was cretated in 2020 as a merger between CoSI (2003) and LIS France (2006) to promote intergenerational living. They act as informants, accompany the project. Contact: contact@cohabilis.org
Source: https://www.cohabilis.org/
The city of Vienna is one of the largest property managers in Europe and has put together rules for flats exchange (for municipal/community/rental apts), where one of the main criteria to be fulfilled is that both apartments meet the reasonable housing needs of the future tenant.
Source: https://www.tauschwohnung.com/blog/wohnungstausch/wohnungstausch-wien
ID 27: Right to exchange flats
Implementation example:
Supported flat exchange in Düsseldorf:
In Düsseldorf there is a support for flat exchanges in the free market. But instead of a right to exchange flats, the property owner can apply for a bonus of 2,500 Euros if they agree to the exchange. Furthermore, the city Düsseldorf offers extensive support, such as personal consultation for the flat exchange platform, a flat exchange bonus and support for logistics, under certain circumstances financial support for conversions into barrier free dwellings.
Source: Haus & Grund Düsseldorf. (2022). Klein gegen groß – Innenstadt gegen Stadtrand https://www.hausundgrundddf.de/wohnungstausch.html
Right to exchange flats in Austria:
Under the following circumstances the right to exchange flats is part of the Austrian tenancy law (§ 13 MRG (Mietrechtsgesetz), n.d.):
− Both households have a rental contract with the property owner for at least five years
− Both apartments are in the same municipal area
− There is an important social, health or professional reason (e.g., larger apartment for a growing family)
− Both dwellings correspond to the appropriate living needs of the future tenants
− No judicial termination or eviction action is pending
− The exchange can be reasonably expected of the landlords (§ 13 MRG (Mietrechtsgesetz))
The since 2011 available Austrian flat-exchange platform immobilientausch.at is free of charge for private users and is getting more attention also through media reports since 2018. (Immoblilientausch, 2021) A newspaper article 2021 reports that still not many successful exchanges were made, but they are also not monitored by the free flat exchange platform. Barriers that could explain the low number of exchanges are specific whishes form both sides about the future home, and the low awareness of the opportunity of the exchange as well as the high transaction costs . While success factors for the flat exchange are the large and growing pool of offers and exchange partners without time pressure. Also, real estate agents and banks are not experiencing high numbers of exchanges. Even though it would have an advantage for house owners who might need the money of selling their house to buy the new one. This advantage is especially important for older people who less likely obtain a real estate loan. (Markert, 2021) The city of Vienna promotes and offers consultation regarding switches of dwellings in state owned dwellings along with a brought offer of other consultations, but they are not mentioning the right to exchange flats as part of their tenancy law. (Stadt Wien, 2022)
Sources: Immobilientausch. (2022). Immobilientausch.at. Retrieved from Über Immobilientausch: https://www.immobilientausch.at/ueber-immobilientausch
Stadt Wien. (2022). Wiener Wohnen. Retrieved from Wohnungstausch: https://www.wienerwohnen.at/mieterin/tauschwechsel/wohnungstausch.html
Markert, S. (2021). Suche Haus, biete Wohnung – Immobilientauschbörsen entstehen auch am Bodensee. Südkurier. Retrieved from https://www.suedkurier.de/ueberregional/wirtschaft/suche-haus-biete-wohnung-immobilientauschboersen-entstehen-auch-am-bodensee;art416,10861227
https://www.jusline.at/gesetz/mrg/paragraf/13
Policy Instrument ID 28: Moving bonus
Implementation Example: The city of Frankfurt am Main already offers a moving bonus when moving out of a social housing flat, provided that the current flat is too large and the new flat is smaller.
Source: German Zero: See info sheet on the flat exchange premium programme: “FRANKFURT.DE – DAS OFFIZIELLE STADTPORTAL, Umzugsprämie. Stadt Frankfurt am Main. (from German Zero 2021, p. 367).
ID 29: Moving advice
Quantification: Potential DB ID 101, Measure: Smaller living space: Supporting senior homeowners with larger living spaces to “downsize” of 1% or 0,5 % of of eligible households – GHG saving potential: 0,5Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 16; Potential DB ID 102, Measure: Smaller living space: Reduce vacancy rate in granny flats in owner-occupied homes (1.25 or 2.5% of vacant flats) – GHG saving potential: 0,15Mio t CO2/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 16; Potential DB ID 111, Measure: Reduction in per capita demand for living space by 3 % per year by 2030 (focus: older people) – GHG saving potential: 13,8million t CO2 see Gaude et al. (2021) p. 17.
ID 30: Advice for change of use
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 77, Measure: Municipal Action Agency for Efficient Housing Use, 0.25 % participation rate per year for subletting and 0.10 % per year for relocation of identified eligible households – Energy saving potential: 201GWh/a and GHG saving potential: 45019t CO2/a see Fischer et al. (2020) p. 30;
Potential DB ID 257, Measure: Optimisation of existing building use through adaptability to changing requirements in the life cycle of a building; reduction potential in districts – Energy saving potential: 50% see Rehmann et al. (2022) p. 26.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Implementation example: The RAUMTEILER programme supports local authorities and volunteers in finding private housing. The nationwide project was launched in 2017. The results so far: over 1,200 people placed, 390 signed tenancy agreements, more than 22,800 square metres of housing placed and well over 100 fewer vacant flats.
Sources: https://www.staedtetag-bw.de/raumteiler
Implementation example: In Göttingen, the Housing Agency serves as a central point of contact, providing advice on issues relating to housing construction and the efficient use of existing properties.
Source: Stadt Göttingen, „Wohnraumagentur“, Stadt Göttingen.
https://www.goettingen.de/portal/seiten/wohnraumagentur-900000208-25480.html
ID 35: Subsidy for splitting Single-Family-Houses
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 6, Measure: Promotion for the division of single-family homes of homeowners of retirement age with subsequent rental of the divided living space – Energy saving potential: 4TWh/a of heating and GHG saving potential: 1,07million t CO2/a see Brischke et al. (2016) p. 90;
Potential DB ID 76, Measure: Instrument set for the structural division of single-family houses, 0.5 – 1% participation rate p.a. of identified eligible households – Energy saving potential: 186,5GWh/a and GHG saving potential: 44460t CO2/a see Fischer et al. (2020) p. 29;
Potential DB ID 85, Measure: Appropriate dimensioning; target group: young couples starting a family – Energy saving potential: 18,55GWh of electricity see Fischer et al. (2020) p. 38.
Policy Instrument ID 310: Permit and promote alternative housing
Implementation Example: Eco Village Hannover: An attractive, mixed, affordable and sustainable neighbourhood which is currently being built in Hannover/Germany. It integrates many sufficiency aspects (smaller living spaces, much shared use…).
Measure / action: Sufficiency-oriented building modifications
Policy Instrument ID 74: Design of development plans with diverse and mixed use
Implementation Examples:
Eco village Hanover. A very “attractive”, affordable and sustainable district with smaller living spaces and a lot of shared use.
Source: https://www.ecovillage-hannover.de/
Housing cooperative in Zurich with reduced living space per person and a relatively high “social mix” at the same time
Source: see https://www.kalkbreite.net/ (last access on 22.12.2023); see https://www.mehralswohnen.ch (last acceess on 22.12.2023).
Prohibition of the establishment of shops relevant to the city centre on the outskirts of Ravensburg in order to enable short distances and keep the city centre lively, liveable and dense. (also ID 196)
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. Oekom Verlag, p. 40.
Flensburg (DE): Sufficiency-orientated urban development in a 53-hectare district with reduced living space per person, a higher proportion of green spaces and mixed uses for shorter distances. (also ID 196)
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. Oekom Verlag, p. 62.
Policy strategy: Using existing buildings for living space
Measure / action: Use of vacant buildings
Implementation example: Private start-up. Finding vacant houses (scouting the market, are contacted by owners) in the city. Managing the renovation (insulation, solar panels and preservation of ancient buildings) and acting as intermediate between owners and renters. The house is transformed into a coliving initiative (tenants share resources). On average 8 people per house. In brussels ShareHome manages 80 houses and 600 tenants.
Source: https://www.sharehomebrussels.com/
Policy Instrument ID 31: Monitoring vacancies
Implementation Example: In almost all of Germany’s federal states, laws on the alienation of housing (Zweckentfremdungsgesetz) have been enacted to enable municipalities to prevent vacancies, demolitions, conversion to commercial use, tourism accommodation and structural alterations that prevent the use of housing.
Source: German Zero 2021, p. 369.
Implementation example: FREE RIGA was first a movement, then an NGO working closely with the municpality on temporary use matters: Identifying (mapping) vacancy, getting the recognition of vacancy as a problem and measuring the demand for creative, social and artistic temporary use; Providing a service of intermediary between owners and users of the spaces; Cooperating with municipality and discovering stronger value proposition in form of tax reductions; Developing a cooperative platform, instead of centralized, vertical organization. They also act as intermediate between owners and prospective users.
Implementation example: Habitat for Humanity UK developped a toolkit to help local community-based organisations and charities across the UK to convert vacant, commercial spaces into good quality social housing.
Source: https://www.habitatforhumanity.org.uk/emptyspacestoolkit/
Implementation example: France has a national policy against vacancy: “plan national de lutte contre les logements vacants”. Really interesting feature is a tool, called LOVAC, launched in 2020, crossing data from different national and local databases (including data collected from taxes), for municipalities to access and get better understanding of how much vacant homes (and what types etc.).
Sources: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/plan-national-lutte-contre-logements-vacants
ID 299: Support the use of vacant buildings and offices for housing
Implementation example: ‘The ‘LebensRäume’ team in the district of Steinfurt researched how local authorities can utilise existing living space more efficiently. The approach: through generation-specific adaptation. The ‘LebensRäume’ concept can be used to older people can be provided with suitable living space, while vacant families, vacant property can be made available. The concept for housing mobilisation includes public relations work, orientation advice for older people and a network of advice and support services.’
Quellen: https://kommunen-innovativ.de/lebensraeume
https://leben-vor-der-stadt.de/alle-artikel/ein-leben-nach-dem-einfamilienhaus-ermoglichen-viele-sind-gefordert
Quantification: A ‘Lebensräume’ survey in the Steinfurt district revealed that around 20 per cent of older people could imagine renting out vacant rooms or flats in their own homes. Around half of them would consider moving. Multi-generational living is the most popular option. To meet this demand, the district needs more offers in the medium term – such as small, low-barrier flats with services or multi-generational living in existing neighbourhoods.
Sources: https://kommunen-innovativ.de/lebensraeume
https://leben-vor-der-stadt.de/alle-artikel/ein-leben-nach-dem-einfamilienhaus-ermoglichen-viele-sind-gefordert
Implementation example: Old factory vacant area ought by the municpality of Cologne and transformed into a sustainable living space quarter that interates the old and protected factory buildings
Source: https://www.modernestadt.de/projekte/clouth-quartier/
Implementation example / Quantification:
Initial situation: “Office building that had never been used and was surrounded by a neighbourhood with a need for housing;
Measures: Retention of parts of the old building: such as the staircase, the wide windows, some concrete columns, which were used as design elements). Conversion of 500 square metres of office space into 86 one- or two-room apartments (with an average size of 82 square metres);
Inclusion of a café, a gym, a pharmacy and other shops that were part of the office building but had to be closed for safety reasons and are now being made accessible to residents again.
Further installation of feed pumps, ventilation, etc.
Comparison of life cycle analysis: 62% reduction in WLC rating compared to a new building and 82% reduction in embodied carbon.
Sources: Housing Europe
(https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/housing-planning/2022/11/01/former-dublin-office-complex-to-provide-homes-for-more-than-200-people/)
Reducing carbon footprint without reducing the delivery of social and affordable homes (youtube.com)
Implementation examples: ‘Los Angeles, California: The state acquired hotels to convert them (initially intended as temporary housing options) into permanent long-term housing
Helsinki, Finland: Conversion of emergency shelters into long-term housing: Salvation Army night camp example: race renovation created 81 flats in 2012.
Source: FEANTSA, Urban Challenges, Housing Solutions: Understanding Cities’ Vacant Housing Potential to Provide Adequate Affordable Housing Solutions:: https://www.feantsa.org/en/report/2023/01/31/ , S. 18, 19
Implementation examples: Cluster living in a former monastery now used for a residential project with a coworking area, guest house and seminar business (existing building structure is already designed for communal living and reduced living space consumption) 300 rooms are subdivided in different clusters composed of small rented flats/rooms that each share a kitchen and different living rooms. There are also rented rooms for professionals.
Created at the initiative of WOGENO München that promotes self-organized, social, and ecological living, exists since 2018.
contact: kontakt@cohaus-schlehdorf.de
Source: https://cohaus-schlehdorf.de/hintergrund/
Habitat for Humanity has focused its housing efforts on rehabilitating homes and offering them as affordable rentals to address the great need for decent, affordable shelter in the U.K, then expanded to Poland and Ukraine, and now even beyond, for example in Austria.
Brussels: The Public Administration Act was reformed in 2022. Since then, this procedure has been activated by several Brussels municipalities. If owners do not comply with the regulations, the vacant properties in question are put back on the rental market. At a social tariff.
Example Lyon: Municipality contacts owners to offer them solution to put their vacant dwellings back on the market. (subsidies for renovation and support for rental management)
Source: FEANTSA, Urban Challenges, Housing Solutions: Understanding Cities’ Vacant Housing Potential to Provide Adequate Affordable Housing Solutions (p. 15)
Policy Instrument ID 302: Support the use of vacant buildings and offices for housing
Quantification: Potential DB ID 295, Measure: Conversion of current and future vacant office space due to the trend towards more home offices to living space (less new build): Higher space efficiency, inherent energy efficiency; reduction of the commuter traffic required to date traffic – GHG saving potential: 9,2million t CO2/a see Zimmermann et al. (2023) p. 37.
ID 322: Tax vacant dwellings
Implementation examples:
– Amsterdam: fines for not reporting vacancy
– Austria: Salzburg and Styria granted municipalities the right to tax empty flats
– Ireland: taxing residential properties which are occupied as a dwelling for less then 30 days in a 12-months period
Sources: FEANTSA, Urban Challenges, Housing Solutions: Understanding Cities’ Vacant Housing Potential to Provide Adequate Affordable Housing Solutions (feantsa.org)
https://klimarat.org/wp-content/uploads/Klimarat-Endbericht-WEB.pdf
Example Leuven (Belgium): Need for more social housing addressed by looking to use empty buildings: incentivize property owners to address vacancies through “empty home takes” also for secondary residences (1500€ per empty home and 108€ per room or studio smaller than 60m2), cities takes ownership through “right to first buy.
Source: FEANTSA, Urban Challenges, Housing Solutions: Understanding Cities’ Vacant Housing Potential to Provide Adequate Affordable Housing Solutions (S. 12): https://www.feantsa.org/en/report/2023/01/31/
Implementation example: France: “Vacancy taxes, which encourage owners to reintroduce empty dwellings to the housing market in areas where there is unmet demand, in order to improve access, especially by low-income households.
In 2013, the vacancy tax in France was substantially strengthened. The duration of tax-free vacancy was reduced to one year, and the tax rate began at 12.5 per cent of potential rent income and increased to 25 per cent in the years following the property being left vacant. The government also made the tax compulsory for local areas with more than 50,000 inhabitants.
Taxes can be selectively applied to discourage undesirable land uses. These are also relevant for the conversion of empty dwellings to livable homes.
Research on the application of the tax has found that it influenced the behavior of owners of vacant units, who converted their dwellings for use as primary residences and reduced the vacancy rate by a substantial 13 per cent over four years, with stronger results in areas of higher vacancy. The tax accounted for a 13 per cent decrease in vacancy rates between 1997 and 2001, especially among long-term vacant dwellings, and most vacant units were turned into primary residences.”
Policy Instrument ID 338: Tax vacant dwellings
Implementation Example: The Lombardy Region and the Municipality of Milan are promoting a special status for supporting the refurbishment of abandoned buildings. The new regulation allows for an extension of the floor area up to 20% of the actual size, the municipal building taxes are reduced, and in parallel the amount of taxes for new buildings in green fields is increased by 20-50%. The existing buildings are reused as the use of undeveloped land has an additional cost. The land use is reduced for satisfying new needs, the existing structures are reused.
Source: Wuppertal Institut (2022): Mapping of local sufficiency initiatives. D 4.1, p. 16.
Measure / action: Protect existing buildings and living space
Policy Instrument ID 33: Protection of living space by control numbers
Implementation Example: In order to avoid latent vacancies, the letting of a flat as a holiday home should only be allowed if the landlords provide a housing protection number. This makes it easier for the municipalities to enforce the law and is already being implemented unbureaucratically in Hamburg, for example.
Source: Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Wohnen Hamburg. (from German Zero 2021, p. 369).
ID 68: Prohibition of misuse of living space
Implementation example: In Freiburg, unauthorised misappropriation of living space, such as leaving a flat empty for more than six months, is an administrative offence under the Misappropriation Prohibition Act, which came into force in 2014 and can be punished with fines of up to €50,000 per flat.
Source: https://www.freiburg.de/pb/,Lde/-/205332/;vbid1977/;vbmid3
Measure / action: Vertical densification
Policy Instrument ID 70: Reduce approval requirements for house-top story addition
Multiple benefits: A study by the TU Darmstadt found that the addition of more storeys to residential and non-residential buildings has a potential of 2.3 million flats.
Source: TU Darmstadt/Pestel Institut, Deutschlandstudie 2019. “Wohnraumpotenziale in urbanen Lagen”, p. 67. (from German Zero 2021, p. 380).
Measure / action: Conversion of buildings into living space
Policy Instrument ID 75: Loans for conversion to living space
Implementation Example: “Anyone who converts existing housing into social housing can collect more than 100,000 euros from the city and state of Thuringia. Prerequisite: Landlords who commit to renting out housing at 33 per cent below the local comparative rent for a certain period of time can collect the one-off premium at the beginning of the tenancy. The longer the future commitment, the higher the premium.”
Sources: https://www.tuebingen.de/verwaltung/verfahren#foerderung_von_sozialem_wohnraum_im_bestand
https://leben-vor-der-stadt.de/alle-artikel/ein-leben-nach-dem-einfamilienhaus-ermoglichen-viele-sind-gefordert
Policy strategy: Sustainable urban- and settlement development without new sealing
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Measure / action: Reduce urban sprawl
Implementation example: In Switzerland the distinction between Land on which can be built and “unbuildable land” is a fundamental base of the spacial planning.
Switzerland’s Spatial Planning law of 2014 only allows new build within existing settlements or after proof of demand (cap on average dwelling floor area per person)
Improvements 2018: only the most necessary buildings are allowed to be builtin non-building land
Sources: “https://www.uvek.admin.ch/uvek/de/home/raumentwicklung/revisionen-raumplanungsgesetz.html
https://www.uvek.admin.ch/uvek/de/home/uvek/medien/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-72730.html “
Measure / action: Support inner-city green areas
Policy Instrument ID 80: Determine green area factor for city planning
Multiple benefits:
Inner-city green spaces not only act as CO2 sinks, but can also provide protection when cities heat up even more in summer in the future as a result of climate change: 1 m³/m² of additional green volume leads to a reduction of about 0.3 °C.
Source: “Tervooren, Verification of vegetation in regard of greenvolume as potential for climate-adaption -Using the example of the state-capital Potsdam”, p. 74. (from German Zero 2021, p. 386).
Green spaces provide better air quality because they filter fine dust from the air.
Source: “Gith, Saubere Atemluft – Forscher empfehlen Grünflächen auszubauen“. (from German Zero 2021, p. 386).
Planting directly binds CO2, but also reduces the energy required for heating and cooling. In summer, evaporative cooling and shading reduce the need for cooling.
Sources: Technische Universität Darmstadt: Gutachten Fassadenbegrünung, p. 13.
Pfoser, Fassade und Pflanze: “Potenziale einer neuen Fassadengestaltung”, p.74 f. (from German Zero 2021, p. 387).
Another positive effect is the protection of the building fabric from environmental impacts. Building greening dampens noise, improves air quality and lowers the ambient temperature.
Source: Pfoser, Fassade und Pflanze: “Potenziale einer neuen Fassadengestaltung”, 92 ff. (from German Zero 2021, p. 386).
Greening buildings can contribute to the preservation of biodiversity in cities.
Source: Pfoser, Fassade und Pflanze: “Potenziale einer neuen Fassadengestaltung”, p. 97. (from German Zero 2021, p. 387).
Implementation Example: The practice of stipulating green roofs in development plans since the mid-1990s, together with the Open Space Design Statutes of 1996, which stipulate green roofs on garage roofs and gravel press roofs of 100 m2 or more, has led to a situation in Munich where the total area of green roofs is very high compared to other cities.
Source: Deutscher Dachgärtner Verband e.V.: “Fernerkundliche Identifizierung von Vegetationsflächen auf Dächern zur Entwicklung des für die Bereiche des Stadtklimas, der Stadtentwässerung und des Artenschutzes aktivierbaren Flächenpotenzials in den Städten”, p. 35. (from German Zero 2021, p. 387).
Measure / action: Limit land consumption to net-zero
Policy Instrument ID 62: Upper limit for land consumption + allocation scheme
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 7, Measure: Residential space moratorium and settlement limit – Energy saving potential: 15TWh/a of heating and GHG saving potential: 3,4million t CO2/a see Brischke et al. (2016) p. 92;
Potential DB ID 192, Measure: Allocation of quotas for land use to reach net zero land use in 2035 – GHG saving potential: 54million t CO2 see Müller-Schulz et al. (2023) p. 51;
Potential DB ID 251, Measure: Reduction of land utilisation (land use change): Land consumption of 20 ha/day in 2030 – GHG saving potential: 2million t CO2 eq see Purr et al. (2021) p. 38.
Policy Instrument ID 63: Cap-and trade system for construction area
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 141, Measure: Limiting the use of new land for settlement and transport purposes (MMS) (direct net reduction) – GHG saving potential: 0,3Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 238, 239;
Potential DB ID 142, Measure: Limiting the use of new land for settlement and transport purposes (MMS) (direct net reduction) – GHG saving potential: 0,3Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 238, 239;
Potential DB ID 143, Measure: Limiting the use of new land for settlement and transport purposes (MMS) (direct net reduction) – GHG saving potential: 0,3Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 238, 239.
Policy Instrument ID 343: Impede new construction
Implementation Example: The Lombardy Region and the Municipality of Milan are promoting a special status for supporting the refurbishment of abandoned buildings. The new regulation allows for an extension of the floor area up to 20% of the actual size, the municipal building taxes are reduced, and in parallel the amount of taxes for new buildings in green fields is increased by 20-50%. The existing buildings are reused as the use of undeveloped land has an additional cost. The land use is reduced for satisfying new needs, the existing structures are reused.
Source: Wuppertal Institut (2022): Mapping of local sufficiency initiatives. D 4.1, p.16.
Measure / action: Reduce car parking spaces
ID 77: Abolish privileges for underground parking spaces
Quantification: Potential DB ID 296, Measure: No underground parking garage – GHG saving potential: 20% of the building’s GHG emissions see Zimmermann et al. (2023) p. 38.
Policy strategy: Reduce energy consumption
Measure / action: Raising awareness for the reduction of energy consumption
ID 26: Information about energy savings by reduced heating temperature
Quantification: Potential DB ID 59, Measure: One-Stop-Shop to facilitate pensioner households to move to smaller flats or share the flat – Energy saving potential: 7TWh and GHG saving potential: 1,81million t CO2/a see Fischer et al. (2016) p. 438; Potential DB ID 260, Measure: Create transparency for consumers regarding consumption and costs and thus encourage more energy-saving behaviour. – Energy saving potential: 15% see Rehmann et al. (2022) p. 24.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Quantification: 1°C decrease of room heating temperature = 6-8% energy reduction.
Source: Öko-Institut & Fraunhofer ISI 2015 (p. 118); BMWK 2022.
ID 137: Consumer consulting
Quantification: Potential DB ID 82, Measure: Convergence through technology counselling; target group: young couples starting a family – Energy saving potential: 6,6GWh of electricity see Fischer et al. (2020) p. 38.
ID 139: Information campaigns
Quantification: “Energy audits and consultation, when individuals are informed about their own energy use and given advice on how to lower their consumption, were the most effective. Under this strategy, consumers reduced their energy use by 13.5 % on average.”
Source: Bertoldi, P. (2017): Are current policies promoting a change in behaviour, conservation and sufficiency?.
ID 140: Peer energy comparision
Quantification: Providing individuals with comparisons with their peers’ energy use can reduce the energy use by 11,5% on average.
Source: Bertoldi, P. (2017): Are current policies promoting a change in behaviour, conservation and sufficiency?.
ID 141: Real-time information about the energy consumption
Quantification: Potential DB ID 260, Measure: Create transparency for consumers regarding consumption and costs and thus encourage more energy-saving behaviour. – Energy saving potential: 15% see Rehmann et al. (2022) p. 24.
Measure / action: Reduce hot water provision
ID 404: Limitation/switch-off of hot water in public buildings
Quantification: Potential DB ID 92, Measure: Closure of a VHS building between the years – Energy saving potential: 13000kWh/a of electricity see Fischer et al. (2020) p. 12.
Industry / Production
Policy strategy: Reduce waste
Measure / action: Mitigate waste production
Implementation examples:
‘NochMall is the first department stores‘ for second-hand goods in Berlin, which is much more than just a second-hand department stores’. The NochMall not only sells furniture, clothing, electrical appliances, household goods, toys, books and much more on over 2,000 square metres to give them a second life, but is also a place to experience the circular economy and waste prevention.’
Source: https://www.nochmall.de/konzept (last accessed on 22/12/2023)
The Concular Shop offers high-quality used building materials and construction materials from demolished buildings. The products and materials have been tested by an experienced team and analysed for their suitability for the circular economy.
Source: https://shop.concular.de/ (last accessed on 22/12/2023)
Platform for the online sale of surplus metal: ‘Vanilla Steel is the largest independent digital platform for metals in Europe and is based in Berlin. The founding team consists of 4 tech entrepreneurs who combine 50 years of digital experience and are passionate about solving existing challenges through digitalisation.’
Source: https://de.vanillasteel.com/about-us (last accessed on 22/12/2023)
Implementation example: ‘In Eskilstuna, an hour west of the capital Stockholm, people can go shopping without compromising their environmental awareness: the first second-hand shopping centre is located there. ReTuna made it into the 2020 Guinness Book of Records as the ‘world’s first shopping mall for repaired, recycled and restored items’. On 5,000 square metres and two floors, 13 shops offer exclusively second-hand goods. […] The shopping centre is part of the ecological transformation of Eskilstuna as an industrial location.’
Source: see https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000118983445/im-weltweit-ersten-secondhand-einkaufscenter-begegnen-schweden-der-kaufscham (last accessed on 15/01/2024)
Policy strategy: Increase durability of products
Measure / action: Larger market share of repaired and durable products
Policy Instrument ID 152: Mandatory disclosure on the minimum lifetime and expected lifespan of a product
Quantification: Potential DB ID 19, Measure: extend products lifetime by implementing a satutory warranty of 5 years ans setting the defects liability to 10 years and regulating a mandatory availability of components for at least 20 years to ensure prospective repairability – Energy saving potential: 11,3322TWh/a of process heat (electricity, synthetic gas) see Eerma et al. (2022) p. 3; Data Table 1.
Policy Instrument ID 153: No choice between repair vs. new product
Other additional information: Washing machines would have to be used for at least 17-23 years and tumble dryers 11-18 years, even taking into account the efficiency improvements of newer appliances, in order to compensate for the GHG emissions of production, distribution and recycling. Smartphones would even have to be used for up to 232 years, as not only are additional resources consumed, but newer devices also consume more energy.
Source: Zuloaga et al: “Cool products don´t cost the earth”. (from German Zero 2021, p. 144).
Policy Instrument ID 155: Regulate repairability of products
Quantification: If the lifespan of all washing machines, notebooks, hoovers and smartphones within the EU were extended by one year, around 4 million tonnes of CO2 could be saved.
Source: Calculations by German Zero based on: Zuloaga et al: “Cool products don´t cost the earth”, p. 5. (from German Zero 2021, p. 140).
Policy Instrument ID 160: VAT-reduction for repaired products; repair services
Implementation Example: Luxembourg plans to consider applying the heavily reduced 3% VAT rate to eligible repair work under European law.
Source: https://environnement.public.lu/dam-assets/actualites/2020/05/Integrierter-nationaler-Energie-und-Klimaplan-Luxemburgs-2021-2030-endgultige-Fassung.pdf , p. 86.
Implementation Example: In Sweden, the VAT on repairs is reduced from 25% to 12%.
Source: https://knowledge-hub.circle-economy.com/article/3624?n=Government-tax-break-program-for-repair
Policy Instrument ID 389: Prohibition of planned obsolescence
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 211, Measure: Lifetime extension and re-use of components – GHG saving potential: 3,9Mio t CO2e/a see Pauliuk & Heeren (2021) p. 487 (fig.4) or Supporting Information SI2 (tab fig.4 or https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2Fjiec.13091&file=jiec13091-sup-0002-SuppMat2.xlsx);
Potential DB ID 263, Measure: Extension of the useful life of the washing machine (from 12 to 17 years) – GHG saving potential: 0,1Mio t CO2/a see Rüdenauer & Prakash (2020) p. 39; Potential DB ID 264, Measure: Extension of the useful life of the notebook (from 5 to 10 years) – GHG saving potential: 0,9Mio t CO2/a see Rüdenauer & Prakash (2020) p. 42;
Potential DB ID 265, Measure: Extension of the useful life of the smartphone (from 2,5 to 7 years) – GHG saving potential: 0,9Mio t CO2/a see Rüdenauer & Prakash (2020) p. 45;
Potential DB ID 266, Measure: Extension of the useful life of televisions (6 to 13 years) – GHG saving potential: 2,3Mio t CO2/a see Rüdenauer & Prakash (2020) p. 48.
Measure / action: Enable customers to repair products
Policy instrument ID 156: Access to spare parts
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 223, Measure: Produce less and smaller cars through a reduction of vehicle size (no new SUVs in 2045) and a prolongation of car usage (17,5 instead of 10 years in 2045) + more acceptance of remanufactured cars (spare parts) – GHG saving potential: 1,6Mt CO2-eq. see Prakash et al. (2023) p. 82 (237 for measure description);
Potential DB ID 185, Measure: Remanufacturing (=restoring the functional capability of a used product, which at least meets the customer’s requirements at the initial operation) of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 1,65PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110;
Potential DB ID 186, Measure: Remanufacturing (=restoring the functional capability of a used product, which at least meets the customer’s requirements at the initial operation) of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 2,99PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110;
Potential DB ID 187, Measure: Direct reuse of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 1,7PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110;
Potential DB ID 188, Measure: Direct reuse of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 3,07PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110.
Policy instrument ID 158: Access to affordable spare parts
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 223, Measure: Produce less and smaller cars through a reduction of vehicle size (no new SUVs in 2045) and a prolongation of car usage (17,5 instead of 10 years in 2045) + more acceptance of remanufactured cars (spare parts) – GHG saving potential: 1,6Mt CO2-eq. see Prakash et al. (2023) p. 82 (237 for measure description);
Potential DB ID 185, Measure: Remanufacturing (=restoring the functional capability of a used product, which at least meets the customer’s requirements at the initial operation) of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 1,65PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110;
Potential DB ID 186, Measure: Remanufacturing (=restoring the functional capability of a used product, which at least meets the customer’s requirements at the initial operation) of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 2,99PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110;
Potential DB ID 187, Measure: Direct reuse of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 1,7PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110;
Potential DB ID 188, Measure: Direct reuse of passenger car spare parts – Energy saving potential: 3,07PJ of primary energy see McKenna et al. (2013) p. 110.
Policy instrument ID 161: Repair bonus
Quantification: One repair saves an average of 24 kilograms of CO2 equivalents. If the lifespan of all washing machines, notebooks, vacuum cleaners and smartphones in the EU area were extended by just 1 single year, around 4 million tons of CO2 could be saved.
Source: https://mein.wien.gv.at/wienerreparaturbon/#/ (as at 20.12.2023) and https://www.verbraucherzentrale-bayern.de/sites/default/files/2022-08/22-04-25_vzbv-positionspapier_recht-auf-reparatur.pdf (p.4).
Implementation Example: With the “Vienna repair voucher”, 50% of the costs for a repair are covered up to an amount of EUR 100. The amount is deducted directly from the bill for the repair. Within the first campaign period from 21 September to 14 December 2020, around 8000 items were repaired with a repair voucher. This saved around 190 tonnes of CO2.
Source: Calculations by German Zero based on: Stadt Wien, Förderprogramm: “Wien repariert´s – Der Wiener Reparatur-bon”. https://www.wien.gv.at/umweltschutz/wienerreparaturbon.html. (from German Zero 2021, p. 143).
Implementation Example: A repair bonus is existing in the German federal state of Thuringia and in Austria.
Sources: https://www.reparaturbonus-thueringen.de / https://www.reparaturbonus.at/.
Implementation Example: In France, repair shops with the so-called “QualiRépar” seal of approval repair many damaged electronic devices that are no longer covered by the warranty. The repair of covered devices is guaranteed and a flat-rate discount on the repair price is deducted directly from the invoice amount.
Source: https://epargnonsnosressources.gouv.fr/actualites/bonus-reparation/
Policy strategy: Exnovation
Measure / action: Phase-out of environmentally harming materials
Policy instrument ID 164: Ban microplastics
Implementation Example: In Spain, added microplastics in cosmetics and detergents will be banned from July 2021.
Source: Wandler: Spanien geht gegen Plastikmüll vor. https://taz.de/Spanien-geht-gegen-Plastikmuell-vor/!5690428. (from German Zero 2021, p. 150).
Implementation Example: In Sweden, microplastics have been banned in “rinse-off” cosmetic products since 2018. In France, microplastics in exfoliating and cleaning products have also been banned since 2018.
Source: Fraunhofer Institut für Umwelt-, Sicherheits- und Energietechnik: “Mikroplastik und synthetische Polymere in Kosmetikprodukten sowie Wasch-, Putz und Reinigungsmitteln”, p. 62 ff. (aus German Zero 2021, p. 150).
Measure / action: Reduce barriers (policies, legislation, cultural) for sufficiency
ID 143: Eliminate barriers for wood-use
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 17, Measure: Promoting a modal shift in the construction industry from steel and cement to wooden structures. Demand reduction of 4.6% in high-temperature process heat demand due to reduced steel production – Energy saving potential: 9,06174TWh/a of synthetic gas and electricity ( p.2) see Eerma et al. (2022) p. 3; Data from Fig. 1. and Table 1.;
Potential DB ID 21, Measure: modal shift in the construction industry from steel and cement to wooden structrues by 3% and a reduction of average floor space per capita in residential and commercial heating (high and medium process heat) – Energy saving potential: 11,64248TWh/a of process heat (electricity, synthetic gas) see Eerma et al. (2022) p. 3; Data Table 1.;
Potential DB ID 212, Measure: Material substitution: wood buildings and alu cars – GHG saving potential: 1,7Mio t CO2e/a see Pauliuk & Heeren (2021) p. 487 (fig.4) or Supporting Information SI2 (tab fig.4 or https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2Fjiec.13091&file=jiec13091-sup-0002-SuppMat2.xlsx)
Policy strategy: Strengthen regional economies
Quantification: a local and sharing service economy can reduce up to 18% of the European carbon footprint compared to the baseline (2007)
Source: Vita et al. 2019.
Land-use and food
Policy strategy: Increase regional food production and processing
Implementation examples: A huge urban farm with a community garden was established in Paris in 2020.
Source: https://agripolis.eu/.
Policy strategy: Reduction of live stock
Measure / action: Diet shift
Quantifications:
When 50% of Europeans eat meat only once per week and have a roughly 70% lower dairy consumption this would reduce GHG emissions in 2050 by 73 Mt which equals 16% of emissions from agriculture.
Source: McKinsey 2020.
A vegan / vegetarian diet reduces the GHG emissions of the European footprint by 13.9% / 9% (compared to 2007) and reduces the land footprint by 4.7% / 0.6%.
Source: Vita et al. 2019.
A switch to animal-free protein sources such as soy, lentils, other pulses and meat substitute products reduces global GHG emissions by 18-87% (central value 40%).
Source: Creutzig et al. 2022.
Quantification: An overview of the reduction potential of activity levels in ambitious European net-zero scenarios can be found here: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad966e
Policy instrument ID 1: Animal protein tax
Multiple benefits: If animal products would be taxed with the regular (instead of reduced) VAT rate of 19% (instead of 7%) in Germany, this would generate 5 billion € additional tax revenue.
Source: UBA 2016.
Policy instrument ID 2: School-based programs
Quantification: Potential DB ID 96, Measure: 50% decrease in meat dishes served in public catering facilities – GHG saving potential: 0,55Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15.
Policy instrument ID 5: Action plan on mass catering
Quantification: Potential DB ID 96, Measure: 50% decrease in meat dishes served in public catering facilities – GHG saving potential: 0,55Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Quantification: A 50% reduction of meat dishes in public mass catering saves 0,43 million tonnes of GHG / year (range: 0,2-0,92 Mt GHG).
Source: UBA 2022.
Policy instrument ID 6: Diet shift: voluntary self-commitment of employers/cantines
Implementation example: The Berlin Student Union operates a purely plant-based canteen and has a total animal-based food content of less than 16 percent.
Quelle: E. Buchheim, „Planetary-Health-Mensa 2023: 5 wegweisende Konzepte für den Außer-Haus-Markt“, ProVeg Deutschland.
https://proveg.com/de/blog/planetary-health-mensa-2023/
Quantification: Potential DB ID 96, Measure: 50% decrease in meat dishes served in public catering facilities – GHG saving potential: 0,55Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15.
Policy instrument ID 8: Masterplan with nutritional recommendations compatible with the Paris Agreement / PHD
Quantification: Potential DB ID 233, Measure: transition to a more plant-based diet according to EAT-Lancet study (planetary health diet, PHD) – GHG saving potential: 28,7Mt CO2-eq. see Prakash et al. (2023) p. 106 f. (261-269 for measure infos).
Policy instrument ID 9: Taxation of animal products
Quantification: Potential DB ID 217, Measure: Increase VAT on animal products (variant: simultaneous reduction of VAT on plant products) – GHG saving potential: 4,05Mt CO2-eq. see Postpischil et al. (2022a) p. 60.
Policy instrument ID 314: Climate-friendly catering
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 38, Measure: Cook on an induction stove and bake in a well-planned manner, if necessary cook larger quantities (in stock or together with friends/neighbours), use a pressure cooker and avoid a few dishes with particularly long cooking or baking times – Energy saving potential: 80kWh of electricity see Fischer et al. (2013) p. 17;
Potential DB ID 96, Measure: 50% decrease in meat dishes served in public catering facilities – GHG saving potential: 0,55Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15.
Measure / action: Reduction of animal farming and international trade of animal products
Policy Instrument ID 13: EU wide emission trading for animal products and mineral fertilizer
Quantification: Emissions trading for the production of animal products and the application of mineral fertilisers and the spreading of mineral fertilisers, the emissions trading system sets incentives to reduce approx. 80 % of the emissions (emissions attributable to agriculture in the EU according to the IPCC).
Source: Calculations by German Zero based on: EU (2020): “2020 National Inventory Report (NIR)”, p. 562. (from German Zero 2021, p. 408).
Policy strategy: Reduction of food waste / overconsumption and -production
Measure / action: Reduction of food waste
Implementation examples: Law against food waste in France.
Sources: LOI n° 2016-138 du 11 février 2016 relative à la lutte contre le gaspillage alimentaire (1). 2016.
Deutscher Bundestag, „Ausarbeitung. Rechtliche Vorgaben in Frankreich gegen Lebensmittelverschwendung“. 2018.
https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/568808/21ec9f0fbd1bce3c48c063f24498428e/wd-5-095-18-pdf-data.pdf
Quantification: A reduction of food waste globally leads to a 8-25% reduction of GHG emissions (central value 15%).
Source: Creutzig et al. 2022.
Quantification: An overview of the reduction potential of activity levels in ambitious European net-zero scenarios can be found here: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad966e
Policy instrument ID 21: Development of a network of distribution platforms and food platforms
Quantification: Potential DB ID 155, Measure: Foodsharing: collecting food that can no longer be sold and redistributing it to interested parties (2 case studies evaluated) – GHG saving potential: 1,6t CO2 eq/a see Jessing et al. (2021) p. 20-22.
Policy instrument ID 308: Sale of “over-the-date” food or passing to social markets
Quantification: Potential DB ID 155, Measure: Foodsharing: collecting food that can no longer be sold and redistributing it to interested parties (2 case studies evaluated) – GHG saving potential: 1,6t CO2 eq/a see Jessing et al. (2021) p. 20-22.
Measure / action: Reduction of the consumption of climate harmful food and drinks
Policy instrument ID 24: marketing ban of climate harmful foods and drinks
Quantifications:
When 50% of Europeans eat meat only once per week and have a roughly 70% lower dairy consumption this would reduce GHG emissions in 2050 by 73 Mt which equals 16% of emissions from agriculture.
Source: McKinsey 2020.
A vegan / vegetarian diet reduces the GHG emissions of the European footprint by 13.9% / 9% (compared to 2007) and reduces the land footprint by 4.7% / 0.6%.
Source: Vita et al. 2019.
A switch to animal-free protein sources such as soy, lentils, other pulses and meat substitute products reduces global GHG emissions by 18-87% (central value 40%).
Source: Creutzig et al. 2022.
Implementation example: UK: A complete online advertising restriction for products with a high fat, sugar and salt content.
Source: UK Government.
Policy strategy: Steer and reduce agricultural area
Measure / action: No agricultural use of wetlands
Quantification: Measures on organic soils under arable land and grassland: Abandonment of peat extraction by 2030. Complete conversion of arable land to grassland. Complete rewetting of grassland. Together, this results in 35.8 million tonnes of CO2 reduction potential in 2050.
Source: Tanneberger, Franziska; Abel, Susanne; Couwenberg, John; Dahms, Tobias; Gaudig, Greta; Günther, Anke et al. (2021): Towards net zero CO2 in 2050: An emission reduction pathway for organic soils in Germany. https://mires-and-peat.net/media/map27/map_27_05.pdf
ID 178: Regulate use of wetlands (no agricultural use)
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 134, Measure: Implementation of the Natural Climate Protection Action Programme (ANK): field copses, rewetting of peat soils (MMS) -> direct net reduction – GHG saving potential: 0,8Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 224,225,239;
Potential DB ID 135, Measure: Implementation of the Natural Climate Protection Action Programme (ANK): field copses, rewetting of peat soils (MMS) -> direct net reduction – GHG saving potential: 1,5Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 224,225,239;
Potential DB ID 136, Measure: Implementation of the Natural Climate Protection Action Programme (ANK): field copses, rewetting of peat soils (MWMS) -> direct net reduction – GHG saving potential: 1,7Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 226, 227, 241;
Potential DB ID 137, Measure: Implementation of the Natural Climate Protection Action Programme (ANK): field copses, rewetting of peat soils (MWMS) -> direct net reduction – GHG saving potential: 4,3Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 226, 227, 241.
ID 362: Rewetting of peat soils
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 131, Measure: Rewetting of peat soils (MMS) – GHG saving potential: 0,2Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 225, 238, 239;
Potential DB ID 132, Measure: Rewetting of peat soils (MMS) – GHG saving potential: 0,8Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 225, 238, 239;
Potential DB ID 133, Measure: Rewetting of peat soils (MMS) – GHG saving potential: 1,5Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 225, 238, 239;
Potential DB ID 243, Measure: Annual rewetting of 5.3% of agricultural land on drained peat soils – GHG saving potential: 22million t CO2 eq see Purr et al. (2021) p. 38;
Potential DB ID 250, Measure: Rewetting of moors + Active forest conversion and near-natural forest management + No peat extraction from 2040 (elimination of more than 2 million tonnes of CO2eq) + Preservation of permanent grassland (counteract conversion of permanent grassland to arable land, but possibility of rewetting permanent grassland on peat soils) + Reduce new land use to less than 30 ha/day by 2030 – GHG saving potential: 13million t CO2 eq see Purr et al. (2021) p. 36 ff.
Policy strategy: Extensify land-use to increase natural carbon sinks
Measure / action: Increase biomass in forests
ID 386: Reduction in timber extraction, especially for hardwoods
Quantification: Potential DB ID 261, Measure: Reduction in timber extraction, especially of hardwood, by 25 % compared to BAU, proportion of areas without forestry utilisation at 16 %. – GHG saving potential: 40Mio t. CO2 see Reise et al. (2024) p. 25;
Potential DB ID 262, Measure: Reduction in timber extraction, especially of hardwood, by 25 % compared to BAU, proportion of areas without forestry utilisation at 16 %. – GHG saving potential: 68Mio t. CO2 see Reise et al. (2024) p. 25.
Transport (incl. freight)
Policy strategy: Reduce trips: work
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Measure / action: Reduce commuting trips
Policy Instrument ID 192: Right to Work from Home
Quantifications: “Arbeiten nach Corona – Warum Homeoffice gut fürs Klima ist”, p. 7, estimates the CO2 savings potential in a conservative scenario of 25% teleworking share with two additional home office days per week at 3.2 million t CO2 per year; in the case of an increase to 40% even to 5.4 million t CO2 per year (p. 14).
Borderstep Institut (2021): “Klimaschutzpotenziale der Nutzung von Videokonferenzen und Homeoffice – Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung von Geschäftsreisenden”, p. 6, estimate the savings potential through videoconferencing at 3 million t CO2/year and the reduction potential through home office at 1.5 t CO2/year.
The Wuppertal Institute assumes a saving of 5% of transport expenditure if 30% of employees worked in a home office every second working day.
Source: cf. Wuppertal Institute (2020): “CO2-neutral by 2035: Key points of a German contribution to compliance with the 1.5°C limit”, p. 79.
Source: Calculations by German Zero based on: IZT (2020). (from German Zero 2021, p. 209).
Policy Instrument ID 232: Mandatory company mobility management
Quantification: Potential DB ID 99, Measure: Mandatory mobility management in all supreme federal authorities and their business units as well as in (private and municipal) companies with 250 or more employees – GHG saving potential: 1,45Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Implementation Example: Following the example of Italy and Brussels, larger companies (Brussels: from 200 employees, Italy from 300 employees in cities with more than 150,000 inhabitants) should be legally obliged to establish mobility management. This would require both an inventory of current mobility data and the derivation of an action plan with the definition of goals and responsible persons. This obligation would contribute to institutionalising mobility management nationwide.
Source: For international comparison: ILS NRW (2007): “Weiterentwicklung von Produkten, Prozessen und Rahmenbedingungen des betrieblichen Mobilitätsmanagements durch eine stärkere Systematisierung, Differenzierung und Standardisierung”, p. 47ff. (from German Zero 2021, p. 215).
Measure / action: Promotion of teleworking
ID 188: Teleworking agreements with companies
Quantification: Potential DB ID 53, Measure: Telemeetings (substitution of 30% of the business trips in 2030) – Energy saving potential: 21,5TWh/a of final energy consumption and GHG saving potential: 5,6Mio t CO2/a see Fischer et al. (2016) p. 86 + 120.
ID 192: Right to work from home
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 72, Measure: Telework, 50% of population works 4 of 5 days from home – Energy saving potential: 143PJ see Fischer et al. (2016) p. 495;
Potential DB ID 73, Measure: Telemeetings, 40% of work trips can be replaced by virtual meetings – Energy saving potential: 148PJ see Fischer et al. (2016) p. 495;
Potential DB ID 157, Measure: Remote work: Reduction potential of 5 additional days in remote work (compared to pre-corona), progressive scenario (35% remote work quota), theoretical potential – GHG saving potential: 9,6Mio t. CO2e see Kreye et al. (2022) p. 24;
Potential DB ID 158, Measure: Remote work: Reduction potential for 50% of working time in remote work, progressive scenario (35% remote work quota), potential categorised as realistic – GHG saving potential: 3,7Mio t. CO2e see Kreye et al. (2022) p. 25.
Policy strategy: Reduce trips: local supply
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Measure / action: Transit-oriented space planning
Policy Instrument ID 196: Space planning urban/rural
Implementation Examples:
Prohibition of the establishment of shops relevant to the city centre on the outskirts of Ravensburg in order to enable short distances and keep the city centre lively, liveable and dense. (also ID 74
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. Oekom Verlag, p. 40.
Flensburg (DE): Sufficiency-orientated urban development in a 53-hectare district with reduced living space per person, a higher proportion of green spaces and mixed uses for shorter distances. (also ID 74)
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. Oekom Verlag,
Policy strategy: Reduce motorized individual transport
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Quantification: An overview of the reduction potential of activity levels in ambitious European net-zero scenarios can be found here: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad966e
Quantification: When cities want to introduce car-reduced streets or neighbourhoods, they have to expect resistance. However, experience has shown: Once the neighbourhood is closed to cars and the residents can experience the benefits for themselves, many former opponents become supporters. This was the case in Barcelona and Paris, for example, and also in the district of Ottensen in Hamburg. The project “Ottensen macht Platz” was rated as “good” or “very good” by 78% of the residents surveyed.
Source: see Bezirksamt Altona 2020: Ottensen macht Platz. (last accessed on 17.03.2021) – from: Blanck, Jakob (2021): Städte für Menschen, nicht für Autos, p.3.
Multiple benefits: In Hamburg-Ottensen, citizens’ initiatives organised flea markets and art exhibitions, held summer festivals on the car-free streets or set up street furniture. 80 % of the residents perceived an improvement in the quality of stay.
Source: see Bezirksamt Altona 2020: Ottensen macht Platz. (last accessed on 17.03.2021) – from: Blanck, Jakob (2021): Städte für Menschen, nicht für Autos, p.4.
Measure / action: Reduce parking in public place
Policy Instrument ID 202: Re-assignation of parking spaces
Implementation Example: In Siegen, parking spaces and traffic-calmed streets were removed to create recreational areas in the city centre along the River Sieg.
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. Oekom Verlag, p. 51.
Policy Instrument ID 203: General restriction of allowed parking
Implementation Example: Following the example of Switzerland, the federal states could re-define common use, increased common use and special use and exclude parking in public spaces from common use (possibly with exceptions for short-term parking for charging electric vehicles). This could lead to parking only being allowed in separately designated areas instead of having to define no-parking zones.
Source: see SRU (2020): Umweltgutachten 2020. – from: GermanZero (2022): 1,5-Grad-Gesetzespaket, p. 700.
Policy Instrument ID 204: Red. obligatory parking space/appartment
Implementation Example: Berlin was the first and for almost two decades the only federal state to abolish the general parking space requirement back in the mid-1990s. Exception: Disabled parking spaces for buildings in public use, § 50 BauO Bln, s. EZBK/Stock, 136. EL Oktober 2019, BauNVO § 12 Rn. 115.
Source: see GermanZero (2022): 1,5-Grad-Gesetzespaket, p. 701.
Policy Instrument ID 206: Residents parking fee increase
Implementation Example: In Munich’s city centre, the daily fee in two parking licence areas is therefore being raised from € 6 to € 10 on a trial basis to see if this can effectively reduce the number of long-term parkers.
Source: see Hutter, Dominik (2017): Parken in Wohngebieten könnte bis zu 100 Prozent teurer werden. In: SZ.de (18.09.2017). last access on 17.01.2019. – from Agora Verkehrswende (2019) , p.28).
Implementation Example: Until this year, there was a nationwide regulation that a resident parking permit in Germany may not cost more than 30.70 EUR per year. By comparison, such a permit would cost 827 EUR in Stockholm, 535 EUR in Amsterdam and 258 francs [approx. 240 EUR] in Basel.
Source: Ferber: “Parkausweise für Anwohner werden deutlich teurer”. (Stand. 12.09.2020). (from German Zero 2021, p.232).
Implementation Example: The city of Tübingen increased the resident parking fees times 4-6. SUVs now need to pay more than smaller / lighter cars.
Multiple benefits: Increase of resident parking fees times 4-6 in Tübingen (SUVs to pay more) will lead to additional revenues of 576.000 Euro (6.400 allowanes).
Policy Instrument ID 237: Digital parking controls
Quantification: Potential DB ID 196, Measure: Intelligent car park solutions that prevent parking search traffic – GHG saving potential: 0,5million t CO2 see NPM (2019) p. 45, 47.
Measure / action: Reduction of parking traffic
Policy Instrument ID 238: Support of parking management system
Quantification: About 30 % of the traffic in the city comes from driving around searching a parking space.
Source: see Schubert, A (13.05.2019): Kampf gegen die Parkplatzsuche (last access on 30.05.2021). – from: GermanZero (2022): 1,5-Grad-Gesetzespaket, S. 702.
Measure / action: Infrastructure investment shift to public transport
Policy Instrument ID 211: Legal basis for infrastructure needs planning (national)
Implementation Example: In this context, it would also be important to improve public participation in demand planning, following the French example: a model for good participation is the “Commission Nationale du débat public” (CNDP) in France. Road projects with a length of more than 40 km or costs of more than 300 million euros must be subjected to mandatory public debate.
For further information see: BUND (2018:”Grünbuch nachhaltige Planung der Verkehrsinfrastruktur”, p. 25. (from German Zero 2021, p. 230).
Measure / action: Disincentivise car aquisition/ownership
Policy Instrument ID 241: Car admission tax
Other additional information: A registration tax (“malus system”) is preferable to a frequently demanded bonus-malus system because of its better overall ecological balance. In France, such a system not only cost the state 300 million EUR in the first three years due to the difficulty of estimating the economic balance; the bonus also led to increased demand, which in turn increased the overall fleet size.
Sources: Bundesumweltministerin S. Schulze, Der Tagesspiegel: Käufer von spritfressenden Autos sollen mehr zahlen (Stand: 02.02.2020).
SPD (2020): “Beschlussbuch des ordentlichen Bundesparteitags vom 06. bis 08. Dezember 2019”, p. 90
SRU (2017): “Für ein Bonus-Malus-System als Übergangsinstrument: Umsteuern erforderlich: Klimaschutz im Verkehrssektor”, p. 139.
UBA: “Mehr Förderung für Pkw mit niedrigen CO2-Emissionen”. (Stand: 09.08.2019).
Agora Energiewende / Agora Verkehrswende (2019): “15 Eckpunkte für das Klimaschutzgesetz”, p. 2.
Klima-Allianz Deutschland: “Klimaschutzplan 2050 der deutschen Zivilgesellschaft”, p. 21.
Wuppertal Institut (2020: “CO2-neutral bis 2035: Eckpunkte eines deutschen Beitrags zur Einhaltung der 1,5-°C-Grenze”,p. 89.
Adelphi/Ecofys (2018): “Bonus-Malus Vehicle Incentive System in France”.
Vgl. D’Haultfoeuille et al. (2014): “The Environmental Effect of Green Taxation: The Case of the French Bonus/Malus.” (from German Zero 2021, p. 219).
Policy Instrument ID 347: Premium for car scrapping
Implementation Example: Incentivo rottamazione is a regional regulation promoted by the Piemonte Region in 2021. It promotes an incentive scheme for dismissing a car without buying a new one. People who don’t need a new car can profit from incentives, reducing needs and land use for parked cars and abandoned cars. A number of incentive schemes are available at regional and national level for improving the car stock in terms of emissions (electric or low emission cars, slow mobility etc.), this is the only one promoting avoidance. The financing scheme was discontinued in 2021.
Source: Wuppertal Institut (2022): Mapping of local sufficiency initiatives. D 4.1, S. 16.
Measure / action: Higher cost of car use
Policy Instrument ID 235: City road charge
Quantification: In Stockholm, inbound MIT traffic was reduced by 19% following the introduction of an experimental city toll. In a follow-up votation, 53% of inhabitants agreed to the continuation of the instrument.
Source: SRU 2020 p. 357ff.
Implementation Example / Multiple benefits: “The three largest European urban road pricing systems started during a decade (first London in 2003, then Stockholm in 2006, finally Milan in 2008)…The schemes have been able to reduce negative externalities generated by traffic, such as accidents, congestion and emissions, up to different levels and to generate modal shift towards public transport.”
Source: Croci, E. (2016): Urban road pricing: a comparative study on the experiences of Lodon, Stockholm and Milan. Transportation Research Procedia, 14. 253-262. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.062 (p.260).
Measure / action: Car-free city centers
Policy Instrument ID 231: Car access restriction
Implementation Example / Quantification: In Ghent, the city centre is completely car-free. The six districts around the city centre are closed to through traffic; the only way to get from one district to another by car is via a circular bypass. This has halved car traffic between 2012 and 2019.
Source: see Watteuw, Fillip (2020): Mobility and public space development. Ghent, 2020 – from: Blanck, Jakob (2021): Städte für Menschen, nicht für Autos (p.3).
Implementation Examples: Nevertheless, every city is different and therefore has to find individual solutions. Pontevedra in Spain, for example, was able to make the entire city centre a car-free zone because the medieval city centre is only about two kilometres in diameter and everything is accessible within walking distance. For larger cities, a concept with several car-reduced neighbourhoods spread across the city, such as the “superblocks”, is more likely to be considered.
Source: see Jiao, Jiacheng; He, Sheng; Zeng, Xiaochen (2019): An investigation into European car-free development models as an opportunity to improve the environmental sustainability in cities: The case of Pontevedra. – from: Blanck, Jakob (2021): Städte für Menschen, nicht für Autos, p.3.
Madrid city centre with few cars – Introduced by a left-wing mayor, abolished by her right-wing conservative successor and reintroduced by court order after complaints from the population.
Source: Wandler, R. (08.07.2019): Madrids Zentrum nun fast autofrei. taz (last access on 22.12.2023).
Policy Instrument ID 321: Car-free days
Quantification: Potential DB ID 32, Measure: Every second week car-free Sunday; 0.5 car-free day per week – Energy saving potential: 3% of of the annual fuel consumption of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles see Fee et al. (2022) p. 12.
Policy Instrument ID 330: Car access restriction to city quarters (Superblocks)
Implementation Examples:
The concept of Superblocks has now been integrated into the mobility plans of other cities. For example, in the Spanish city of Vitoria-Gasteiz. Here, the urban area has been divided into a total of 77 superblocks, which are to be implemented one after the other.
Source: see Civitas Prosperity o.J. (last access on 21.12.2023) – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.9.
Between 1993 and 2018, a total of six superblocks were realised in Barcelona. They differ in size and number of inhabitants. The smallest superblock, Poblanou, measures a total of 16 hectares and has 1,486 inhabitants. San Antoni, on the other hand, is 48.81 hectares in size. Almost 38,000 people live there In total, the Urban Ecology Agency (BCNEcologia) envisages 503 superblocks for the entire urban area. Since 2015, the concept of superblocks has been an integral part of Barcelona’s mobility plan, which focuses not only on pedestrians but also on cycling and public transport.
Source: see López, Iván; Jordi Ortega; Pardo, Mercedes (2020): Mobility Infrastructures in Cities and Climate Change: An Analysis Through the Superblocks in Barcelona. Atmosphere 11 (4): 410.; Mueller, Natalie; Rojas-Rueda, David; Khreis, Haneen; Cirach, Marta; Andrés, David; Ballester, Joan; Bartoll, Xavier, et al. (2020): Changing the Urban Design of Cities for Health: The Superblock Model. Environment International 134 (January): 105132. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.8.
Quantifications:
In Barcelona’s Urban Mobility Plan (2019-2024), published by the city council, it is assumed that greenhouse gas emissions will have decreased by 21 percent when all the planned 503 superblocks are built. Once completed, it is also assumed that private motorised transport will have decreased by 19.2 percent, as well as NO2 concentrations from 47.2 μg/m3 to 35.7 μg/m3, a decrease of 24.3 percent.
Source: see López, Iván; Jordi Ortega; Pardo, Mercedes (2020): Mobility Infrastructures in Cities and Climate Change: An Analysis Through the Superblocks in Barcelona. Atmosphere 11 (4): 410.; Mueller, Natalie; Rojas-Rueda, David; Khreis, Haneen; Cirach, Marta; Andrés, David; Ballester, Joan; Bartoll, Xavier, et al. (2020): Changing the Urban Design of Cities for Health: The Superblock Model. Environment International 134 (January): 105132. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.9.
In 2010, the Grácia superblock was recognised as a sustainable “best practice” by UN-Habitat, the United Nations Housing and Human Settlements Programme. There, pedestrian traffic has increased by 10 percent and bicycle traffic by 30 percent. At the same time, car traffic has decreased by 26 percent.
Source: see López, Iván; Jordi Ortega; Pardo, Mercedes (2020): Mobility Infrastructures in Cities and Climate Change: An Analysis Through the Superblocks in Barcelona. Atmosphere 11 (4): 410. ; Roberts, David (2019a): Die Superblocks von Barcelona (last access on 21.12.2023) – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.10.
Multiple benefits:
An increase in the proportion of green space in the Eixample district from 6.5 percent to 19.6 percent should contribute to improved air quality.
Source: see Mueller, Natalie; Rojas-Rueda, David; Khreis, Haneen; Cirach, Marta; Andrés, David; Ballester, Joan; Bartoll, Xavier, et al. (2020): Changing the Urban Design of Cities for Health: The Superblock Model. Environment International 134 (January): 105132. López, Iván; Jordi Ortega; Pardo, Mercedes (2020): Mobility Infrastructures in Cities and Climate Change: An Analysis Through the Superblocks in Barcelona. Atmosphere 11 (4): 410. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.9.
Overall, positive effects on the quality of life of the residents in the neighbourhoods with superblocks are reported. Various parameters influencing human health such as physical activity, noise levels, nitrogen concentration, green spaces, heat have improved. As a result, positive health effects are reported.
Source: see Mueller, Natalie; Rojas-Rueda, David; Khreis, Haneen; Cirach, Marta; Andrés, David; Ballester, Joan; Bartoll, Xavier, et al. (2020): Changing the Urban Design of Cities for Health: The Superblock Model. Environment International 134 (January): 105132. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.10.
Multiple benefits / Quantification: Studies assume an increase in life expectancy of 198 days for all people over 20 years of age. This is mainly due to the fact that nitrogen concentrations (NO2) have decreased and road noise and heat days have become significantly less. At the same time, green spaces have increased. There have also been fewer traffic accidents: According to the report “Balanç accidentalitat 2017” by the Barcelona City Council, the number of road traffic fatalities has decreased from 88 victims in 1990 to only 12 deaths in 2017.
Source: see Mueller, Natalie; Rojas-Rueda, David; Khreis, Haneen; Cirach, Marta; Andrés, David; Ballester, Joan; Bartoll, Xavier, et al. (2020): Changing the Urban Design of Cities for Health: The Superblock Model. Environment International 134 (January): 105132.; Cervero, Robert; Guerra, Erick; Al, Stefan (2017): Beyond Mobility: Planning Cities for People and Places, 298.; Ajuntament de Barcelona (2018) „Balanç accidentalitat 2017“ – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.10.
Measure / action: Relieve disadvantage of public transport users
Policy Instrument ID 239: Car tax reform
Implementation Example: At the company level, employees [in Luxembourg] who choose a means of transport other than the car should not be further disadvantaged. A tax benefit “mobility budget” equivalent to that for company cars will be introduced, thus offering an alternative to the company car.
Source: NECP, Luxemburg, p. 69.
Measure / action: Legal framework adaption
ID 304: Road speed limits
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 30, Measure: 100 km/h (motorway) and 80km/h (extra-urban) – Energy saving potential: 2000Mio. L of liquid fuels and GHG saving potential: 5,3Mio t CO2/a see Fee et al. (2022) p. 12;
Potential DB ID 31, Measure: 120km/h – Energy saving potential: 800Mio. L of liquid fuels and GHG saving potential: 2Mio t CO2/a see Fee et al. (2022) p. 12;
Potential DB ID 98, Measure: Maximum speed of 80 km/h on rural roads and 30 km/h in built-up areas – GHG saving potential: 0,6Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15; Potential DB ID 108, Measure: Speed limit 120 on motorways – GHG saving potential: 2,6million t CO2 /a see Gaude et al. (2021) p. 10;
Potential DB ID 109, Measure: Speed limit 100 on motorways – GHG saving potential: 5,4million t CO2 /a see Gaude et al. (2021) p. 10;
Potential DB ID 112, Measure: Speed limits of 100 km/h on motorways (passenger car traffic) – Energy saving potential: 2million tonnes /a of car fuel and GHG saving potential: 6,2Mio t CO2 see Gehrs et al. (2022) p. 8; Gehrs et al. (2022) p. 8; Hendzlik et al. (2019) p. 22; UBA (2022) p. 2; UBA (2022) p. 2; UBA (2022) p. 2.
Policy strategy: Reduce air transport
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Quantification: An overview of the reduction potential of activity levels in ambitious European net-zero scenarios can be found here: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad966e
Measure / action: Limit supply
Policy Instrument ID 228: Ban on air travel within the EU of less than 600 km
Quantification: Potential DB ID 74, Measure: Reduction of vacation and short trips with aircraft by half – Energy saving potential: 89PJ see Fischer et al. (2016) p. 497; Potential DB ID 107, Measure: Immediate transfer of many short-haul flights to other European countries to the railways – GHG saving potential: 600kt CO2/a see Gaude et al. (2021) p. 8.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Other additional information: According to the EIB’s 2019-2020 Climate Change Survey, 67% of Germans and 62% of Europeans support a ban on short-haul flights.
Source: EIB: “Umfrage der EIB zum Klimawandel 2019–2020”. (from German Zero 2021, p. 269).
Policy Instrument ID 229: Domestic air travel ban
Quantification: Potential DB ID 106, Measure: Immediate halving of domestic German flights – GHG saving potential: 1million t CO2 /a see Gaude et al. (2021) p. 8.
Policy Instrument ID 276: Aviation carbon tax
Quantification: Potential DB ID 97, Measure: Retainment of air traffic tax and additional energy tax of 65 ct/l for domestic flights – GHG saving potential: 0,45Mt CO2 eq/a see Fischer et al. (2022) p. 15.
ID 364: Frequent flyer tax
Quantification: CE Delft calculated that there will be a 21% reduction in aviation’s carbon emissions reduction by introducing the FFL (Frequent Flyer Levy) in the example year 2028.”
Policy Instrument ID 377: Air travel ban
Quantification: Potential DB ID 55, Measure: Halving private air travel – Energy saving potential: 34,7TWh/a of final energy consumption and GHG saving potential: 9,2Mio t CO2/a see Fischer et al. (2016) p. 86 + 123.
Policy strategy: Improve public transport and multi-modality
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Measure / action: Attractive public transport prices
Policy Instrument ID 258: 365€ ticket or cheaper
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 124, Measure: Cheap public transport ticket throughout Germany (Deutschlandticket) (MWMS) – GHG saving potential: 0,52Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 214;
Potential DB ID 125, Measure: Cheap public transport ticket throughout Germany (Deutschlandticket) (MWMS) – GHG saving potential: 0,6Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 214.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Implementation example: The district of Lüchow-Dannenberg introduced a 365-euro annual ticket in September 2022.
Source: https://www.luechow-dannenberg.de/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-161/173_read-12079/
Policy Instrument ID 259: Free local public transport tickets, alternative financing, service expansion
Implementation example: Since 1 March 2020, public transport on national territory in Luxembourg is free of charge for all means of transport, be it bus, train or tram. The measure applies to residents, cross-border commuters and tourists alike.
Source: Luxembourg – Free public transport.
Implementation Example: The spa card allows you to travel free of charge throughout the entire city of Templin (16,000 inhabitants) and the incorporated districts. The prerequisite for this is the purchase of the annual spa card or the Templin citizen card for € 44 at the tourist information centre in the historic town hall.
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. p. 44.
Measure / action: Public transport funding
Policy Instrument ID 250: Employer pay local public transport fee
Implementation Example: Against this background, municipalities in France are entitled to levy an earmarked employer contribution for the financing of public transport. In the capital region around Paris, the levy was able to cover 42% of the required financial resources in 2017 (operating costs and investment costs). A similar model exists in Vienna with the so-called employer levy, which brought the city of Vienna approximately EUR 67 million in 2018.
European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (2019): “Funding and Financing of Sustainable Urban Mobility Measures”, p. 18.
Gesetz vom 11. Juli 1969 und vom 12. September 1969 über die Einhebung einer Dienstgeberabgabe, LGBl. für Wien Nr. 17/1970.
Vgl. Wien (2019): Rechnungsabschluss der Bundeshauptstadt Wien für das Jahr 2018, p. 169.
Policy Instrument ID 286: Higher national & departmental funds
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 105, Measure: Ambitious transport transition in German cities by 2030, Forseen measures: significant increase in funding for public transport, the modernisation of urban bus fleets, the expansion of cycling and new transport planning in cities that prioritises pedestrians and cyclists. – GHG saving potential: 6million t CO2 /a see Gaude et al. (2021) p. 5;
Potential DB ID 152, Measure: Promoting cycling with an additional 500 million euros per year and a 10% increase in public transport services through a more performance- and efficiency-based distribution of financial resources for public transport. – GHG saving potential: 0,5Mio t CO2 see Hendzlik et al. (2019) p. 22.
Measure / action: Higher network density and frequency
ID 379: On-demand transport
In rural areas, regular public transport connections with
sufficiently high frequencies are often not profitable because they are underutilised. On-demand services that are available at any time from door to door or door to station at attractive prices can be a real alternative to private (second) cars, reducing or eliminating dependence on private cars and making them increasingly unattractive. Implementation examples have already been realised in more than 100 German cities/regions.
Source: VDV, „Hochlauf der On-Demand-Verkehre im ÖPNV | VDV – Die Verkehrsunternehmen“. https://www.vdv.de/ondemandumfrage22.aspx
Policy strategy: Improve freight rail
Measure / action: Improve infrastructure
Policy Instrument ID 278: Financial support of road-rail connectivity infrastructure
Other additional information: In this way, the CO2 emissions of a transport chain can be reduced by an average of 55% compared to direct road transport, and the use of primary energy can be reduced by a third.
Source: Calculations by German Zero based on: Nestear (2003): “CO2-Reduzierung durch kombinierten Verkehr”. (from German Zero 2021, p. 248).
Policy strategy: Reduce freight
Quantification: An overview of the reduction potential of activity levels in ambitious European net-zero scenarios can be found here: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad966e
Measure / action: Reduce road freight
Quantification: Freight barges use five times less fuel than trucks for transporting goods. This not only saves emissions, but also conserves resources.
Source: see Agence Parisienne du Climat (2020): Le transport de marchandises à Paris : la Seine comme alternative ?. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.14.
Multiple benefits / Quantification: By transporting up to 48 containers by different means of transport, the “Franprix entre en Seine” project makes it possible to avoid about 450,000 kilometres driven on the roads every year. The distance saved corresponds to a 37 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions. In addition, the NOx content is reduced by 30 percent and the load of fine dust is lowered by ten percent.
Source: see franprix, Groupe Casino (2012): Franprix en Seine. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.14.
Policy Instrument ID 280: Extend and increase freight toll
Multiple benefits: The transport of goods from the port of destination to the shops is carried out by trucks that comply with the Euro-5 emission standard. Between 2010 and 2016, a general decreasing trend in NO2 concentration was observed for Paris, which, according to the study, is due to the introduction of the Euro-5 standard for trucks.
Source: see Font, Anna; Guiseppin, Lionel; Blangiardo, Marta; Ghersi, Véronique ; Fuller, Gary W. (2019): A Tale of Two Cities: Is Air Pollution Improving in Paris and London?“ Environmental Pollution 249 (June): 1–12.; franprix, Groupe Casino (2012): Franprix en Seine. – from: WWF (2020): Gute Beispiele für nachhaltiges, sozial-ökologisches wirtschaften in planetaren Grenzen, p.14.
Policy strategy: Promotion of active modes
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Measure / action: Less road space, more space for bicycles and pedestrians
Policy Instrument ID 267: Conversion of road space to bicycle; pedestrian infrastructure
Implementation Example / Multiple benefits: Temporary pop-up bike lanes were set up in Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg (Berlin) in March 2020. They were used by 290,000 residents and cycle traffic was reported to have increased by 15% in the period under review.
Source: Böcker et al. (2021): Wie wird weniger genug. Oekom Verlag , p. 46.
Measure / action: Promote cycling
ID 215: Expansion of cycling infrastructure and better framework conditions
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 197, Measure: 1000 bike parking facility with bike hire and bike repair shop in cologne – GHG saving potential: 7290t CO2 eq see Paar et al. (2023) p. 28f; Potential DB ID 198, Measure: Bad Keuznach mobile and information point with bicycle garage for 230 bicycle parking spaces – GHG saving potential: 3630t CO2 eq see Paar et al. (2023) p. 29;
Potential DB ID 199, Measure: Bike + Ride 2.0 with covered bicycle parking spaces – GHG saving potential: 2260t CO2 eq see Paar et al. (2023) p. 29;
Potential DB ID 200, Measure: Construction of a structurally separate cycle highway and implementation of a cycle path concept for the town of Buttstädt; integration into the supra-regional cycle path network – GHG saving potential: 8800t CO2 eq see Paar et al. (2023) p. 32;
Potential DB ID 201, Measure: Hanover region: construction of 18 km of cycle path, 24 centre islands, 4 lane junctions – GHG saving potential: 10930t CO2 eq see Paar et al. (2023) p. 32;
Potential DB ID 205, Measure: Hanseatic City of Hamburg, construction of a ramp to connect to the cycle route, installation of hire bikes with e-cargo bikes and several service stations – GHG saving potential: 6840t CO2 eq see Paar et al. (2023) p. 36; Paar et al. (2023) p. 36; Paar et al. (2023) p. 36; Jacob & Taillard (2024) p. 37.
Policy strategy: Setting {sector} limits
Impact Chain: Detailed impact chains with supporting and inhibiting factors for most policy instruments can be found here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28264610.v1
Cross-sectoral
Policy strategy: Re-distribute and reduce paid work time
Measure / action: Regulate reduction of working hours
Policy Instrument ID 135: Four-day work week
Quantification: Potential DB ID 95, Measure: Reduction of working hours, no or only partial wage compensation – GHG saving potential: 10,45Mio t CO2 see Fischer et al. (2020) p. 45.
Policy strategy: Limits to consumption
Measure / action: Ban certain products
ID 305: Ban on all highly damaging goods
Quantification: Potential DB ID 182, Measure: Decrease in the production of energy-intensive basic materials – Energy saving potential: 24TWh of gas as fuel and feedstock see Luderer et al. (2022) p. 20.
Measure / action: Disincentivise high energy consumption
Policy Instrument ID 91: Reduced energy subsidies for companies
Quantification:
Potential DB ID 246, Measure: Price transport in line with the polluter-pays principle (including a CO2 price significantly above the current BEHG price path and reduction of environmentally harmful subsidies in air traffic, company cars, diesel and distance allowance) + Strengthen public transport by expanding infrastructure and securing funding + Adapt planning and (road) laws to the requirements of the mobility transition + Phase out the combustion engine in new cars 2032 to 2035 + Phase out the pure combustion engine in new lorries 2035 to 2038 + Use e-fuels in air and sea transport – GHG saving potential: 61million t CO2 eq see Purr et al. (2021) p. 28 ff.
ID 107: Progressive electricity tariffs
Implementation example: Electricity prices in California
Source: L. Thiele, „Soziale und klimagerechte Energietarife“. https://konzeptwerk-neue-oekonomie.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/
Soziale_und_klimagerechte_Energietarife_KNOE_2022_Hintergrundpapier.pdf
Policy Instrument ID 307: Mandatory energy audits
Quantification: Potential DB ID 24, Measure: electricity reduction in the industrial sector through behavioural changes via energy audits, energy information system + social marketing – feedback, four-day week/shorter working time/ less prodution – Energy saving potential: 17,6TWh/a of electricity see Eerma et al. (2022) p. 2; Data Table 4.
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14779100
Implementation example: In Germany, all companies with an energy consumption of ≥10 GW/year are legally obliged to implement all identified and economically assessed measures to immediately improve the energy efficiency of their company. These measures must be implemented within 18 months at the latest.
Source: German Federal Law: EnSimiMaVO §4 from the 23.09.2022
Measure / action: Reduction and regulation of advertising
Implementation example: Ban on night-time illumination of advertising billboards in the EnSiKuMav (Energy Saving Ordinance).
Source: Sustainable Prosperity, ‘Policy Database’. https://sustainable-prosperity.eu/policy-database/
Implementation Example: Ban on advertisements for fossil fuels in France since 2022 and ban from fossil fuel companies and the aviation industry in Amsterdam since 2021
Sources: https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/08/24/france-becomes-first-european-country-to-ban-fossil-fuel-ads-but-does-the-new-law-go-far-e.
Sustainable Prosperity, ‘Policy Database’. https://sustainable-prosperity.eu/policy-database/
Quantification: shutting down the illuminated advertisements at night in a (closed) large subway station in Berlin can save as much electricity as 16 four-people households consumpe per year (64 MWh/year).
Source: https://taz.de/Forscher-uebers-Energiesparen/!5861090/.
Measure / action: Limitation of illumination
Implementation Example: In France, a lighting ban has been established in 2013: from 1 a.m. or one hour after leaving the building, lights must be switched off in offices, stores and public buildings. Illuminated advertising is switched off overnight. The violation of the law is punishable.
Source: https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/pollution-lumineuse.
Implementation Example: In Germany, illumination of public non-residential buildings and historic monuments, shop illumination and illuminated advertising at night is temporarily prohibited in winter 2022/2023.
Quantification: The lighting ban in France is estimated to save 2 TWh electricity or 0,25 megatonnes of CO2 p. a. in France.
Source: https://www.heise.de/tp/news/Nachts-in-Frankreich-Licht-aus-2033371.html.
Implementation Example: Light pollution policy in France since 2013, renewed with more ambition in 2018.
Source: https://darksky.org/news/france-light-pollution-law-2018/ (last access on 22.12.2023)
Policy Instrument ID 173: Lighting ban (night)
Quantification: Forecast consumption reduction of 2 TWh per year in France (Consumption by approx. 750000 families)
Source: https://www.heise.de/tp/news/Nachts-in-Frankreich-Licht-aus-203
Policy strategy: Internalisation of external costs and limits to externalisation
Measure / action: Pricing of GHG emissions
Policy Instrument ID 89: Inflation indexing (in fuel taxation reform)
Implementation Example: In order to counteract a permanent devaluation of taxes, tax rates should in future be automatically linked to the development of a consumer price index every year, as in Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden.
Sources: FÖS: “Steuervergünstigung für Dieselkraftstoff”, p. 5.
SRU (2017): “Umsteuern erforderlich: Klimaschutz im Verkehrssektor”, p. 123.
Klima-Allianz Deutschland (2016): “Klimaschutzplan 2050 der deutschen Zivilgesellschaft”, p. 20. (aus German Zero 2021, p. 223).
Policy Instrument ID 92: Carbon pricing
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 115, Measure: EU-Emissions Trading System, effect on industrial sector (with-measures scenario, MMS) – Energy saving potential: 0,3TWh of Final energy demand and GHG saving potential: 4,4Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 165 – 169 (tables 69, 71, 72). Base year value: table 64, p.146.;
Potential DB ID 116, Measure: EU-Emissions Trading System, effect on industrial sector (with-measures scenario, MMS) – Energy saving potential: 5,7TWh of Final energy demand and GHG saving potential: 17Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 165 – 169 (tables 69, 71, 72). Base year value: table 64, p.146.;
Potential DB ID 117, Measure: EU-Emissions Trading System, effect on industrial sector (with-measures scenario, MMS) – Energy saving potential: 8,4TWh of Final energy demand and GHG saving potential: 28,3Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 165 – 169 (tables 69, 71, 72). Base year value: table 64, p.146.
Policy Instrument ID 94: Carbon tax for heat and transport
Quantifications:
Potential DB ID 118, Measure: CO2 pricing for the transport and heating sectors (BEHG), effect on small fraction of emissions of the industrial sector – Energy saving potential: 0TWh of Final energy demand and GHG saving potential: 0,3Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 165 – 169 (tables 69, 71, 72). Base year value: table 64, p.146.;
Potential DB ID 119, Measure: CO2 pricing for the transport and heating sectors (BEHG), effect on small fraction of emissions of the industrial sector – Energy saving potential: 0,2TWh of Final energy demand and GHG saving potential: 1,7Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 165 – 169 (tables 69, 71, 72). Base year value: table 64, p.146.;
Potential DB ID 120, Measure: CO2 pricing for the transport and heating sectors (BEHG), effect on small fraction of emissions of the industrial sector – Energy saving potential: 1,2TWh of Final energy demand and GHG saving potential: 7,6Mio t CO2 eq see Harthan et al. (2023) p. 165 – 169 (tables 69, 71, 72). Base year value: table 64, p.146.
Policy Instrument ID 95: Tax incentives for low-carbon products
Quantification: Potential DB ID 219, Measure: Coffee tax exemption for sustainable and fair coffee – GHG saving potential: 1803t CO2/a see Postpischil et al. (2022b) p. 99.
Policy strategy: Develop a growth independent society
Measure / action: Accept a steady state of the economy, rollback of growth policy
Policy strategy ID 88: Introduce beyond-GDP measurement
Implementation Example: Introduction of Well-Being Budgets in New Zealand, Finland, Iceland, Scotland, Wales, Canada.
Sources: UBA 2021, p.49 / https://www.ecogood.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GWP-PolicyPaper_DE_2023-01.pdf
